VOLUME 3

AN ANSWERE VNTO SIR THOMAS MORES DIALOGE

LOCATION
KEY Commentary Side Textual Bibliographic Scriptural

But assone as the generacion of them that saw the miracles of god were deed / they fell to Idolatrie immediatly as thou seist in the bible. And god when he had delyuered them in to captiuite for to chastise their wekednesse / stered them vpp a prophete euer moare / to call them vn to his testament agayne. And so he did wellnye an hundred tymes / I suppose / yer Christ came / for they neuer bode any space in the right faith. And agenst the comynge of Christ the scribes / Phareses / Caiphas / Anna / and the elders / were crepte vpp in to the sete of Moses / Aaron and the holy prophetes and patriarkes and succeded them linially and had the scripture of god but euen in captiuite / to make marchaundice of it and to abvse it vn to their awne glorie & profitt. And though they kepte the people from outward Idolatrie of worshepynge of images with the hethen: yet they brought them in to a worse inward Idolatrie of a false fayth & trust in their awne dedes and in vayne tradicions of their awne faynynge. And they had put out the significacions of all the ceremonies and sacramentes of the olde testament and taught the people to beleue in the workes selfe / and had corrupte the scripture with false gloses. As thou maist se in the gospell / how Christ warneth his disciples to be warre of the leuen of the phareses which was their false doctrine and gloses. And in a nother place he rebuked the scribes and the phareses sayenge: wo be to them / because they had taken awaye the keye of knowlege and had shutt vpp the kingdome of heven and neyther wold entre in them selues ner sofre them that wolde. How had they shutt it vpp? verely with their tradicions and false gloses whych

90/9 the testament . . . bloude. Cf. Heb. 10.29, 13–20.

90/12 maide of kent. Prudently, More never mentions the Maid of Kent in Dialogue or Confutation. Here and in Obedience (T4), Tyndale refers to this politically dangerous case. After a cure in 1526 attributed to Mary, Elizabeth Barton became a Benedictine nun in Canterbury. Her pious visions turned political when she declared that Henry VIII would die seven months after he married Anne Boleyn. Fisher believed her revelations, but More counselled her not to meddle in public affairs. See Ep. 192, To Elizabeth Barton, Chelsea, Tuesday <1533?> (More, Correspondence 464–66). For his connection with Barton, Fisher was fined 300 pounds, one year's revenue from his diocese, but More's caution won him exemption from penalty. See Alan Neame, The Holy Maid of Kent: The Life of Elizabeth Barton, 1506–1534 (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1971). Barton was executed, together with five priests, on 20 April 1534, the day that the guildsmen of London were called upon to take the oath of succession. Cf. Richard Rex, "The Execution of the Holy Maid of Kent," Historical Research 64 (1991) 216–20, esp. 219. Three days earlier, Fisher and More had gone to the Tower because they refused to take the oath which implicitly rejected papal authority. In her trances, locutions and fasts the Maid of Kent showed some of the characteristics of hysteria. Cf. Nicholas P. Sanos, "Witchcraft in Histories of Psychiatry," Psychological Bulletin 85 (1978) 417–39; rpt. in Articles on Witchcraft, Magic and Demonology 3.212. In her defense, see Diane Watt, "Reconstructing the Word: the Political Prophecies of Elizabeth Barton (1506–1534)," Renaissance Quarterly 50.1 (Spring 1997) 136–63.