VOLUME 3

AN ANSWERE VNTO SIR THOMAS MORES DIALOGE

LOCATION
KEY Commentary Side Textual Bibliographic Scriptural

we him to heare the worde ernistly / rather then to write it in his herte. For whosoeuer hath no nother fealynge of the law of god that it is good / then because of miracles / the same shall beleue in Christe / as did Simon Magus and Iudas: and as they that came out of Egipte with Moses / and fell awaye at euery temptacion / & shall haue good werkes like vn to our popes / bisshopes and cardenales. And therfore when the scripture is fully receaued / there is no nede of miracles. In so moch that they which wyll not beleue Moses and the prophetes when the scripture is receaved / the same wilbe no true beleuers by the reason of miracles / though one arose from deeth to life to preach vn to them by the testimonie of Christe.

180/18 howseled ... dyenge. Cf. CWM 6/1.354/19–20. Tyndale wastes no energy on More's erroneous charge that reformers reserve communion to one's deathbed. In 1521, the king had made the same charge in Ch. 5, his defense of giving communion to the laity only in the form of bread (Assertio, CC 43.137). The idea was lifted out of context from Luther's conclusion to Babylonian Captivity , 1520, where he spoke of Baptism as a new birth and the Lord's Supper as both the memorial of Christ's death and the assimilation of communicants to that death (WA 6.572/23–34; LW 36.124f). Luther said, however, that one exercises both aspects of the Eucharist throughout life and earlier had given good reasons for regular communion (ibid., WA 6.526/23–33; LW 36.57). (JW)

180/20 not spare to twich it. Cf. CWM 6/1.354/22–23.

180/21 perelous . . . oyled them. Cf. CWM 8/1.117/12–13.

And agayne / how doeth S. Hierom / Augustine / Bede and many other old doctoures that were before the pope was cropt vpp in to the consciences of men and had sent forth his damnable sectes / to preach him vnder the name of christe / as christ prophisied it shuld be / expounde this texte / thou arte Peter and vppon this rocke I wyll byld my church / and this texte / Peter fede my shepe / and all power is geuen me in heuen & in erth / and innumerable soch textes cleane contrary vnto al those new old holy doctours that haue made the pope a god? They knew of no power that man shuld haue in the kyngdome of Christ / then to preach Christ truly. They knew of no power that the pope shuld haue to send to purgatory or to deliuer thence / nether of any pardons ner of any soch confession as they preach & teach / nether were many that are articles with you / articles of their faith. They al preached forgeuenesse of synnes thorow repentaunce towar

180/22 Christ . . . spirite. Cf. 2 Cor. 1.21–22.

180/22–23 with his bloude. 1 Pet. 1.2.

180/27–30 Aboute . . . starch. Cf. CWM 8/1.117/14–16. In pondering how long flour preserves its nature, Aquinas takes no firm stand: "And because starch comes of corrupted wheat, it does not seem as if the body of Christ could be made of the bread therefrom , although some hold the contrary" (Summa III, Q. 74, Art. 3, Reply to Obj. 4). According to Tyndale, Oxford theologians were still debating the topic.

180/31 sacrament shuld not be worsheped. Cf. CWM 6/1.354/ 23–25.

180/31–181/11 It is . . . wyll folow. Cf. CWM 8/1.117/27–118/3.