VOLUME 3

AN ANSWERE VNTO SIR THOMAS MORES DIALOGE

LOCATION
KEY Commentary Side Textual Bibliographic Scriptural

This wise reason is their shoteancre and al their hold / their refuge to flight and chefe stone in their fundacion / wheron they haue bilt all their lies and all their mischeue that they haue wrought this .viij. hundred yeres. And this reason do the Iewes laye vn to oure charge this daye / and this reason doeth chefely blynd them and hold them still in obstinacie. Oure spirites first falsifie the scripture to stablish their lyes. And when the scripture cometh to light and is restored vn to the true vnderstondinge and their iuglinge spied / and they like to sofre shippwracke / then they cast out this ancre / they be the church and can not erre / their auctorite is greater then the scripture / and the scripture is not true / but because they saye so and admitte it. And therfore what soeuer they affirme / is of as greate auctorite as the scripture.

Another . . . yeres. Cf. CWM 8/2.675/12–26.

This . . . yeres. Repeated in slightly abbreviated form at CWM 8/2.679/5–8.

Iewes. The Jews are an important topic to Tyndale as a translator of the Pentateuch through 2 Chronicles from the Hebrew Bible (Mozley 173–86; Daniell 283–315, 333–57). In Prelates Tyndale assigns guilt for Christ's death to the leaders of the Jews (A2r—v), but in Obedience he rejects the legitimacy of killing religious opponents, whether Jews, Turks, or heretics (C7v). His chief objection to the Jews is that they, like Turks and papists, supposedly believe in justification by works. Tyndale repeats this charge numerous times in Answer and once in Matthew (o6). Jews openly profess their faith although they are outnumbered by Christians in contemporary Europe (Matthew 02). For the expulsion of the Jews from England, cf. [F2v, “how Englonde was once full” and commentary note]. Tyndale and Erasmus both oppose the Jews for "works-righteousness ";Tyndale focuses on their lack of faith in Christ and Erasmus on their supposed trust in religious ceremonies. In the pivotal Fifth Rule of the Enchiridion (1503), Erasmus warns Christians "that we do not attempt to win God's favour like the Jews through certain observances as if they were magic rites . . ." (Holborn 80/3–5; CWE 66.76). In the Afterword to Markish (152), Cohen summarizes Erasmus' position on the Jews: "His is always an anti-Semitism of letters and literatures, of sources and origins, of languages and texts, and never an anti-Semitism of policy." Although More was proud of his prosecution of heretics, Marius (8) notes that "we find no hostile remark or metaphor about contemporary Jews in all the works of Thomas More." Confident that the Jews would be converted to a reformed Christianity , Luther first showed a positive attitude toward them in That Jesus Christ was born a Jew, 1523 (WA 11.314–36; LW 45.199–229). After the Jews themselves began to proselytize, his attitude began to change as seen in Against the Sabbatarians, 1538 (WA 50.312–37; LW 47.65–98). The comparatively moderate tract Von den letzten Worten Davids, 1543 (WA 54.28–100; not in LW), was followed by the harsh On the Jews and their Lies, 1543 (WA 53.417–552; LW 47.137–306) and Vom Schem Hamphoras, 1543 (WA 53.579–648; not in LW). On 15 February 1547, three days before his death, Luther added an admonition, "Eine vermanung wider die Juden," to his last sermon (WA 51.195–96; not in LW). Cf. Oberman, Luther 35on73,292–97.

And this . . . obstinacie. CWM 8/2.681/4–5.

their auctorite is greater then the scripture. In 1525 Johann Eck (1486–1543) compiled a handbook against Lutheran teachings which went through more than a hundred editions (OER 2.17–19). In Ch. 1 of his Enchiridion, "On the Church and Her Authority," Eck states the priority of the church over Scripture and argues that consequently the church authenticates Scripture (Fraenkel 27; Battles 12–13). Thus, one taking up the arms of biblical argument against ecclesiastical institutions gets entangled in an implicit acknowledgment of the church as the guarantor of the books he wants to cite.

And when . . . scripture. CWM 8/2.685/31–37.

Notwithstondinge / as I saide / the kingdome of heuen stondeth not in wordes of mans wisdome / but in power and spirite. And therfore loke vn to the ensamples of the scripture and so shalt thou vnderstonde. And of an hundred ensamples betwene Moses and Christe / where the Israelites fell from god and were euer restored by one prophete or other / let vs take one: even Ihon the Baptiste. Ihon went before Christ to prepare his waye / that is / to brynge men vn to the knowlege of their sinnes and vn to repentaunce / thorow true expoundynge of the lawe / which is the only waye vn to Christe. For excepte a man knowlege his sinnes and repent of them / he can haue no parte in Christe / of Ihon Christ saith Matt. xvij. that he was Elias that shuld come and restore all thynge. That is / he shuld restore the scripture vn to the right sens agayne / which

Notwithstondinge . . . spirite. Cf. CWM 8/2.690/ 23–24.

Ihon . . . thynge. Cf. Matt. 17.11 and 13, quoting Mal. 4.5–6.