VOLUME 3

AN ANSWERE VNTO SIR THOMAS MORES DIALOGE

LOCATION
KEY Commentary Side Textual Bibliographic Scriptural

As for yperdulia I wold fayne wete where he readith of it in all the scripture and whether the worshuppe done to his lorde the cardinalles hatte were dulia / yperdulia or idololatria. And as for dulia and latria we fynde them both referred vn to god in a thousande places.

the cardinalles hatte. The son of a butcher, Thomas Wolsey (c1473–1530) exercized powers in England second only to the king and the pope. In tracing Wolsey's secular career, Tyndale refers to his brisk management of the French campaign in 1513 (Prelates D3), which earned his appointment as Lord Chancellor, December 1515; his meetings with Charles V (emperor, 1519–55/ 56) in May 1520 and July 1521 (Prelates H1v); his efforts to raise money from Parliament for the invasion of France in 1523 (Obedience E7); his treaty with France in 1527 (Prelates H6). Although Wolsey was forced to resign the office of Lord Chancellor, Tyndale mistakenly asserts that he continued his policies through More, his preferred successor (Prelates K2). Tyndale sneers at Wolsey's death from intestinal disease (1 John D3, D5v), which saved him from trial and execution for treason. Tyndale attacks Wolsey's pluralism in the pun "Wolfsee" (Prelates G4r-v, G6r-v, G7, G8v, H1; 1 John D5v) and calls him "Cayphas" (Prelates H7). Tyndale mocks Wolsey's successively richer ecclesiastical offices (1 John D5v), chief of which were Archbishop of York (September 1514) and Cardinal (September 1515). He became papal legate a latere for a limited term in 1518 and for life in 1524 (Obedience L4, L8v; 1 John D5v). His supposed papal ambitions, however, were frustrated (Prelates H6). Tyndale scorns the elaborate ceremonies associated with Wolsey's reception of the red hat (Prelates K5, 1 John D3). His gentleman usher George Cavendish describes Wolsey's weekday processions to Westminster Hall and Sunday processions to Greenwich, cf. Cavendish 22/32–24/33. Tyndale ironically anticipates Wolsey's canonization ([K4, “the ensample . . . tyme also”; L1, “And of our cardenall . . . of the others”]; Obedience P7). Then, his personal belongings would be venerated as relics: red hat, [E2, “the cardinalles hatte . . . idololatria”; H1, “he worsheped the cardinalles hatt”], ceremonial pillars and pole-axes [G2v, “pilars / polaxes . . . hattes” and commentary note; H6, “polaxes”], ornate chair [K1v, “my lorde cardenales holy cheyar”]. Tyndale does not comment on Wolsey's efforts between 1517 and 1526 to protect tenant farmers and laborers against unlawful land enclosures. Cf. Peter Gwyn, The King's Cardinal: The Rise and Fall of Thomas Wolsey (London: Barrie and Jenkins, 1990) 411–35. Nor does Tyndale mention Wolsey's grandiose projects, Hampton Court and Cardinal College. See Cardinal Wolsey: Church, state and art, ed. S.J. Gunn and P.G. Lindley (Cambridge UP, 1991). Tyndale's older contemporary John Skelton (c1460–1529) targets Wolsey's virtual usurpation of royal power in his verse satires of 1521–22: "Speke, Parott," "Collyn Clout," and "Why Come Ye Nat to Courte?" See John Skelton: The Complete English Poems, ed. John Scattergood (New York: Penguin, 1983). Later in the century, Foxe summarizes Wolsey's career (4.587–617).

Therfore that thou be not begyled with falshed of sophisticall wordes / vnderstond / that the wordes which the scripture vseth in the worshepynge or honouringe of god are these: loue god / cleaue to god / dreade / serue / bowe / praye and cal on god beleue and trust in god and soch like. Which wordes al we vse in the worshepinge of man also / how be it diuersly and the difference therof doeth all the scripture teach.

The true wordes that express the honour of God.[[1573]

God hath created vs and made vs vnto his awne likenes / and our sauioure christ hath bought vs with his bloude. And therfore are we Gods possession of dutie and right and Christes saruauntes only / to wayte on his wil and pleasure / and ought therfore to moue nether hand ner fote ner any other membir / other hert or mynd other wise then he hath appoynted. God is honoured in his awne person / when we receaue all thynge both good and bad at his hande / and loue his lawe with al oure hertes / and beleue hope and long fore all that he promiseth.

vnto his awne likenes. Cf. Gen. 1.27, repeated at [E2v, “God . . . awne image”; E3v, “ymage of god”].

Genesis 1.27

christ . . . bloude. Cf. 1 Pet. 1.18–19.

1 Peter 1.18–19

What it is to honoure God [1531]

all thynge] al things [1573]

loue his lawe. Cf. Ps. 119.97.

Psalms 119.97

The true honour of God.[[1573]

The officers that rule the world in Gods stede / as father / mother / master / husband / lorde and prince are honoured / when the law which almightye God hath committed vnto

What it is to honoure rulars [1531]

Gods stede] [1573], Gods / stede [1531]

husband / lorde] ed., husband- lorde [1531], husband, Lord [1573]

father/mother. Cf. Obedience F8v—G1v; master. Cf. Obedience G2r—v; husband. Cf. Obedience G1v—G2; lorde and prince. Cf. Obedience G3v—G7. Tyndale here alludes to the duties of those in temporal authority, treated more fully in the earlier book.