VOLUME 3

AN ANSWERE VNTO SIR THOMAS MORES DIALOGE

LOCATION
KEY Commentary Side Textual Bibliographic Scriptural
vj.

In the beginnenge of the . vj. he discrybeth marten aftir the ensample of his awne nature / as in other places he discribeth god aftir the complexion of popes cardenals and worldly tirantes.

god . . . tirantes. Cf. CWM 6/1.402/32–403/2. More believes that Lutheran teaching on predestination casts God in the role of a tyrant (6/1.403/1) for not imputing guilt to the elect for their sins nor merit to the reprobate for their good deeds (6/1.400/7–9).

M. Marten will abyde but by the scripture only. T. and ye will come at no scripture only: And as for the old doctours ye wyll heare as litle / saue where it pleaseth you / for all youre crienge / old holy fathers. For tel me this / whi haue ye in englonde condemned the vnion of doctours but because ye wold not haue youre falshed disclosed by the doctrine of them.

Marten . . . only. Cf. CWM 6/1.367/11.

vnion of doctours. See also 213/22. This handbook in Latin contains brief biblical quotations in roman type which introduce longer passages from the Fathers in italic. Unio gives passages on the main topics of early Reformation controversy: original sin, infant baptism, justification, the law, grace, faith and works, confession , fasting, indulgences, the Eucharist, venerating saints, and the Antichrist. Unio quotes approximately 570 passages from Christian authors from the 2c to 12c. Nine Fathers cited by Tyndale, most in Answer and a few in Obedience, are found in Unio: Augustine (42%), Jerome (14%), Chrysostom (10%), Origen (6%), Ambrose (5%), Cyprian (3%), Prosper of Aquitaine (3%), Gregory the Great (2%), Bede (1%), and the church historians Eusebius, Socrates Scholasticus, and Sozomen (1%). Unio quotes other theologians (13%) whom Tyndale never names: Clement of Rome, Tertullian, Athanasius, Hilary, Cyril of Alexandria, Lactantius, Fulgentius, Theophylactus, and Bernard. The editor of the two-part Unio Dissidentium gives his name as Hermannus Bodius, probably a pseudonym. The earliest surviving edition (in two parts) was printed supposedly at Cologne but actually at Antwerp by Martin de Keyser, March and July 1527. In the Folger copy, both parts were supposedly printed at Cologne with Part 1 dated "1527, Decimo Kalendas Decembris" [22 November ] and Part 2, "1527, X. Kalen. Augusti" [23 July]. Cf. J.M. De Bujanda et al., Index de l'Université de Paris: 1544, 1545, 1547, 1549, 1551, 556, Index des Livres Interdits 1 (Sherbrooke, Québec: Editions de l'Université de Sherbrooke, 1994) 144–46. After examining twenty-four editions of Unio Dissidentium, Robert Peters reports that editions published in and after 1531 contain material from Pseudo-Augustine, De Essentia Divinitatis (PL 42.1199–1206). Since the Folger copy includes extracts from this short work (UD 2.S3r—S8v), the ascribed date of 1527 cannot be correct. Cf. "Who Compiled the Sixteenth-Century Patristic Handbook Unio Dissidentium?" Studies in Church History 2, ed. G.J. Cuming (London: Nelson, 1965) 237–50, esp. 237,239. Robert Peters tentatively identified the anthologist as the Strassburg reformer Martin Bucer because of Unio's emphasis on church discipline administered in a loving spirit. Cf. ibid., esp. 245. Later, Peters suggested that the compiler is the Basel reformer Johannes Oecolampadius because of Unio's choice of texts on the Eucharist as a mere sign of Christ's presence. Cf. "The Enigmatic Unio Dissidentium : Tyndale's 'Heretical' Companion?" Reformation 2 (1997) 233–40, esp. 237. On 24 October 1526 Cuthbert Tunstall, Bishop of London, promulgated an order for confiscating dangerous books, including Unio Dissidentium (Foxe 4.667). Other prohibitions followed in the Netherlands, France, Spain, and Rome. Tyndale must have used other patristic sources besides Unio, but it would have given him an extensive though partisan survey of the Fathers. As editor of Whole Works, John Foxe added the marginal note in 1573, "The union of doctors a good booke" (338b).

M. they saye / that a christen man is discharged of al lawes spirituall and temperall saue the gospell.T. ye iugle / we saye that no christen man ought to bynde his brother violently / vn to any lawe wher of he coude not geue a reason out of christes doctrine and out of the lawe of loue. And on the other syde we saye / that a christen man is called to sofre wronge and tiranny (though no man ought to bynde him) vntill god rid vs therof: so fer yet as the tiranny is not directly agenst the law of god and faith of Christe / and no further.

they saye ... gospell. Tyndale quotes CWM 6/1.368/ 29–31 nearly verbatim and CWM 6/1.354/28–31 more freely. More refers to Luther's Freedom of a Christian, 1520 (WA 7.49–73; LW 31.333–77) and works in German which he could not read (cf. CWM 6/2.702).

M. marten was the cause of the destruccion of the vplondish people of germanie. T. that is false for then he coude not haue escaped him selfe. Marten was as moch the cause of their confusion / as Christ of the destruccion of Ierusalem. The duke elector of saxon cam from the warre of those vplondish people and other dukes with him / in to Wittenberge where Marten is / with .xv. hundred men of armes / so that Marten if he had bene gyltie / coude not

vplondish people. Cf. "comen vplandysh people," CWM 6/1.369/7.

destruccion of Ierusalem . Cf. Matt. 24.2, Mark 13.2, Luke 21.6.