condemne] [1573], condeme [1531]

though one pope condemne a nother. Tyndale refers to Honorius I (pope, 625–38), whose utterances about Christ's having a single will and operation were condemned by his successors and then by the sixth ecumenical council Constantinople III in 680–81. The last judgment, by Leo II (pope, elected 681, reigned 682–83), mentions Honorius by name (DS 510–22, 544, 556, 566; 2NPNF 14.351). See Georg Schwaiger, "Honorius I," TRE 15.566–68.

[Hand] [1531]

layde . . . polaxes. Cf. Matt. 27.60, 66, Mark 15.46, Luke 23.53, John 19.40.

Matt. 24.24, Mark 13.22

Matt. 27.60, 66, Mark 15.46, Luke 23.53, John 19.40

The surest way to oppresse true doctrine, is to lay the preachers fast.[1573]

antichriste. This section on the recognizable signs of Antichrist expounds four NT texts foretelling the rise of a vicious and powerful opponent of Christ and his elect. The term "Antichrist " occurs in 1 John 2.18, 2.22, 4.7, and 2 John 7. But Tyndale 's proofs that the papacy is the foreseen antagonist use other passages with different vocabularies. They are 2 Pet. 2.1–3 ([H6, “For first Peter saith . . . H6v . . . ouer you”]), Matt. 24.24 ([H6v, “And Christ . . . H7 . . . true waye”]), 2 Thess.2.9–11 ([H7, “And when Paul . . . H7v . . . beleue lies”]), and, climactically , 2 Tim. 3.1–9 ([H7v, “And Paul saith . . . H8-I1 . . . “false werkes”]). During the first millennium, unformulated opinions about the Antichrist were held by various Christian thinkers. These beliefs then came together in a widely accepted scenario about the role of the great persecutor to appear shortly before the end of the world. Amid papal-imperial struggles from Gregory VII (pope, 1073–85) to the Concordat of Worms (1122), the term "Antichrist" was first used as a polemical epithet hurled against an opponent now living in this world. The radical Franciscans of the early 14c branded John XXII (pope, 1316–34) "Antichrist" for his rejection of the spiritual church. The background of this theme is treated, with abundant bibliography, in the multi-authored entry "Antichrist," TRE 3.20–50. See Bernard McGinn, Antichrist, Two Thousand Years of Human Fascination with Evil (San Francisco: Harper, 1994). Wyclif's late writings list numerous signs that the papal, hierarchical church is Antichrist, now in conflict with Christ and the predestined elect. Cf. De postestate papae, ed. Johann Loserth (London: Wyclif Society, 1907) 118–26, 148–50, 185–90, and 322–30. The Lollards transmitted this fragment of Wyclif's polemic: the pope is Antichrist (Hudson 122/7, 126/159, 126/164, and 126/172); prelates will be damned (Hudson 122/13, 125/128). Tyndale is in all likelihood an eventual recipient of and further spokesman for this conviction. Responding to Exsurge Domine, Leo X's bull of censure, Luther first targeted the papal Antichrist in two works of late 1520: Adversus execrabilem Antichristi bullam (WA 6.597–612; not in LW) and Wider die Bulle des Endchrists (WA 6.614–29; not in LW). Luther restated this theme in his pamphlet following the burning of Exsurge in Wittenberg on 10 December 1520 (WA 7.176–80; LW 31.392–94). Tyndale almost certainly knew Luther's expanded case for the pope as Antichrist, given in an exposition of Dan. 8.23–25, published in 1521 in the Responsio to an attack by the Dominican Ambrosius Catharinus (WA 7.705–78; not in LW), interpreting Daniel on 722–77. But this exegetical treatment starts with a prologue expounding 2 Pet. 2.1–3 (ibid., WA 7.725–28; not in LW), upon which Tyndale draws below. In 1524 this work came out in German under the title Offenbarung des Endchrists aus dem propheten Daniel, which John Frith translated as . . . The reuelation of Antichrist (Antwerp, 1529) STC 11394, and which was banned in 1530. Cf. TRP 1, no. 129, p. 194. Luther argues that the pope is the rex potens faciebus of Dan. 8.23 because of the massive edifice of external forms (facies), such as rank, riches, garb, buildings, rites, and allied institutions, which in the papal church overlay God's fundamental ordinances. Then Luther expounds how the papacy is intelligens propositionum (Dan. 8.23) through the plethora of enactments and doctrines (propositiones) raised by popes to greater binding power than God's word itself. On Luther's Antichrist argument, see John M. Headley, Luther's View of Church History (New Haven: Yale UP, 1963); Scott H. Hendrix, Luther and the Papacy: Stages in a Reformation Conflict (Philadelphia : Fortress, 1981); Konrad Hammann, Ecclesia spiritualis: Luthers Kirchenverständnis in den Kontroversen mit Augustin von Alveld und Ambrosius Catharinus (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989) 162–219 (text), 294–314 (notes), on Luther's interpretation of Dan. 8 in 1521. Tyndale's first independent work, Mammon, is partly a translation of Luther's sermon for the Ninth Sunday after Trinity, 1522 (WA 10/2.283–92; not in LW). In the preface (A3v-A4v), the English reformer asserts that Antichrist is a stealthy spiritual force present throughout history, which has emerged in the pope and his prelates and which is now raging because those versed in Scripture have begun to unmask him. Tyndale developed the Antichrist motif in an extended passage of Obedience (I8v—L8v), less in order to prove its realization in the papacy than to unmask the practices of pope and prelates as fulfilling what Jesus had foretold about Antichrist's ways in Matt. 24.24 and Mark 13.6. Special emphasis fell on their craft against kings and their laws (K3), leading to Tyndale 's outcry for monarchs to arraign prelates, judge them by Scripture, and regain their rightful authority (K6—L8v). Other references show Antichrist opposing key Reformation doctrines by giving false interpretations of Scripture (B6) and teaching that good deeds earn God's love (Q3r—v). Both Obedience (I8v—L8v) and Answer ([H6, “¶ A sure token . . . H6v-I3v . . . him selfe”]) devote a whole section to Antichrist. Other references in Answer assert that Antichrist has already appeared ([H3, “coming of antichriste . . . him by”]) in the person of the pope ([M1v, “I fele . . . M2 . . . the pope is antichrist”; O4, “for to beleue . . . to know antichriste”]); the imposition of clerical celibacy is one of his works ([N5, “But what nettes . . . christes bloude”]). In 1 John (D7r—v, D8v), Tyndale recognizes the presence of Antichrist in the apostolic era and in the Docetist heresy (F3), which denies the true humanity of Jesus.

] Daniel

Matt. 24.24, Mark 13.22

] 2 Peter

] 1 John

] 1 John

] 1 John

] 2 John

Antichrist [1531]OX The Pope is Antichrist. [1573]

persuasions] [1573], persuasuasions [1531]

2. Pet. 2. [1531]